In your work within VET networks (as applied to ASIMAG) on a scale of 1 -10, indicate your agreement with the following statements. In each case:


  • 0 means non-existent
  • 1 means very low or poor
  • 5 means average
  • 10 means excellent


RESULTS

Criteria 1: Quality in Partnerships
Partners share information openly and willingly
A common goal or vision is understood and shared by all partners
Principles and protocols governing networking are understood by all partners
Partnership is `deep`: not just one person form each organisation
Partners communicate well back to their own organisations
Partners are proactive and show leadership
Engagement of partners is voluntary: not enforced
Partnership is valued (time is paid for)
Partners are kept motivated
Language and concepts are clearly understood to facilitate partnership
All necessary partners are involved to address needs
Partnership arrangements are flexible enough
Trust and openness amongst partners exist
There is `ownership` and a sense of responsibility
Criteria 2: Quality in Participation
Network is known and understood by all important stakeholders
Network is open to beneficiaries expressing their needs
Network members have easy access to information
All network members can contribute to debate
Criteria 3: Quality in Review
Network is open to, and values, ongoing critical review
Evaluation and review are prioritised
Results from evaluation review are made widely available
Results from evaluation review easily understood
Results from evaluation review are used to inform planning
Results from evaluation review are used to inform and influence policy
Partners are open to learning lessons form failures as well as successes
Criteria 4: Effective VET Networks
VET networking leads to greater co-ordination
VET networking improves capacity to identify VET needs
VET networking enhances capacity of VET providers
VET networking helps to make positive contribution to VET policy
VET networking enhances capacity to match VET provision with enterprise needs
VET networking enhances capacity to match VET provision with regional development needs
Criteria 5: Using SPEAK in Networks
SPEAK is useful in identifying good practice in partnership
SPEAK is useful in identifying effective participation in networking
SPEAK is useful in establishing quality review and evaluation practices
SPEAK is useful in tracking and understanding the results of VET networking
Enter your organization:


Enter your e-mail address: